BREAKING: Lettuce Lake Skunk Ape was a mother with child

The red dot is in the middle of the babies body as its mother places it down.

The Lettuce Lake Skunk Ape seems to be a mother with child. Watch a zoomed in copy of the video and after the Skunk Ape (Lena) is splashing in the water, it seems to place something down (Lil' Bit) on the ground. The thing on the ground runs off with a tail!! It runs ahead of the mother by about seven feet and makes a splash which is away from the mother and could not have been made by her.

I totally such at making video stills. I did the best I can. Watch the video below by Mike. Near the end of the video, you will see a great sequence of the mother placing the baby down and "Lil Bit" running off ahead of its mother until she can get it to go behind the trees.

In lue of this, the Florida BFRO was premature in its rush to justice on the guys that shot this historic footage.

A tail emerges as the baby runs off ahead of its mother

Watch the video and you will see two different things splashing about

This video near the end shows a sequence that without a doubt is a mother placing a little one on the ground. This shows caring and society among this animals. This video is of historical significance.

Florida BFRO is ignoring Bigfoot evidence

I will explain in this video why the BFRO is ignoring real Bigfoot evidence found in the Green Swamp by Tim Fasano for political reasons. They would rather protect an agenda then discover the truth. Their mission of  "Finding Bigfoot" is only if THEY FIND BIGFOOT. The group I am refering to is the Florida BFRO

Tim Fasano where the Bigfoot video was shot

Tyler Bounds a possible hoaxer

The cheif production assistant for FINDONG BIGFOOT Tyler Bounds responded to my desire for more YouTube footers by saying we don't need "dorks" in the woods. He said he gets personal joy and does not need validation from anyone because he just loves the woods. BS He gets paid! He also planted the prints in the Georgia episode (Cryptomundo raised a skeptical eyebrow) and claimed in Virginia his van at night hit a Bigfoot causing damage. (You can Google all of this. It was in many newspapers). He was alone and no blood or hair found (how convenient). He had a vested interest in hyping the show when it was new. He did not mention that I have found more evidence for Bigfoot then he, or anyone he works for has. What is not wanted is his hoaxing ways. Look at this photo...I see a dork!

A Bigfoot scientifc paper has already been published which does not support the Ketchum Project

Has there ever been a scientific paper written on Bigfoot? With the world waiting for the Ketchum DNA study, is there any other report that uses science to examine the Sasquatch issue? Yes. In 2009 a paper was published by The Journal of Biogeograpy, titled, Predicting the distribution of Sasquatch in North America. The paper used a new mathematical model called ecological niche modeling to compare Sasquatch sightings with Black Bear sightings. By using environmental data such as rainfall, temperature, foliage, density, ect., they created a computer model that could predict the location of such animal and the expected density of population.

The upcoming Ketchum project uses samples gathered at random (a process that could never be duplicated). This new mathematical model would require samples gathered from the high density areas you will see on the maps. Restricting such activity to these areas would make strides towards scientific credibility instead of hackneyed samples being sent in by known hoaxers. Evidence needs to be measurable.

For example, the following would be a common claim by many Bigfoot researchers. However, is it evidence? What would be evidence for the existence of a North American Ape?

"I have been researching Bigfoot in Washington and have 3 hours of video and castings of 2 different foot prints in the snow. I now have a chunk of hair I found on a broken tree branch. I need to find out what kind of animal it came from. It is about 3 inches long and like dry fishing line and there is some hair that is like a under coat or winter coat. You my think I'm crazy but that's ok because I know what I have and some day the world will know too."

Scientist need more then just that kind of evidence so J. D. Lozier, P. Anilio, and M. J. Hickerson submitted a paper with their results on Bear and Sasquatch sightings ( below you will see density for both animals)

Bigfoot density of sightings

Bear density of sightings

This all looks very similar. The authors did a correlative study and explain how niche modeliing works.

"Ecological niche models (ENMs) and species distribution models have become increasingly popular tools for predicting the geographic ranges of species and have been important for conservation (Kremen et al., 2007), for predicting changes in distribution from past or future climatic events (Hijmans & Graham, 2006), and for investigating patterns of speciation and niche divergence (Wiens & Graham, 2005; Carstens & Richards, 2007; Warren et al., 2008). The basic premise of the ENM approach is to predict the occurrence of species on a landscape from georeferenced site locality data and sets of spatially explicit environmental data layers that are assumed to correlate with the species’ range. In many cases, models are based on researchers’ own collection data and on detailed knowledge of the taxa being studied, making predictions reasonable depictions of species occurrences given the current modelling technology. However, the increasing availability of locality data in online literature, museum databases and online data portals [e.g. GBIF (http://data.gbif.org/)] is providing unprecedented access to biodiversity data and allowing researchers to greatly expand the deployment of species distribution models and/or ENMs. While the value of publicly available sample locality data is not questioned, the consequent introduction of errors in the accuracy of specimen identity and georeferencing could be problematic for developing ENMs from public data sources (Graham et al., 2004; Soberón & Peterson, 2004). Although georeferencing inaccuracies can be identified in databases from qualitative or quantitative accuracy thresholds (e.g. http://manisnet.org/GeorefGuide.html), poor taxonomy and/or misidentification may be less detectable. This issue may be particularly problematic, for example, with cryptic species or subspecies that are morphologically similar but may have very distinct ecological requirements and geographic distributions, or for those data sources that contain indirect observations rather than references only to physical specimens."

"The observed value of I = 0.849 indeed indicates a high degree of overlap, and falls well within the null distribution generated from maxent runs for 100 randomizations of Bigfoot and black bear coordinates (Fig. 3; P < observed = 0.32). Thus, the two 'species' do not demonstrate significant niche differentiation with respect to the selected bioclimatic variables. Although it is possible that Sasquatch and U. americanus share such remarkably similar bioclimatic requirements, we nonetheless suspect that many Bigfoot sightings are, in fact, of black bears."

The conclusion of this scientific paper is stated below and it is based on quantifiable computer models.

The availability of user-friendly software and publicly available biodiversity databases has led to a rapid increase in the use of ecological niche modelling to predict species distributions. A potential source of error in publicly available data that may affect the accuracy of ecological niche models (ENMs), and one that is difficult to correct for, is incorrect (or incomplete) taxonomy. Here we remind researchers of the need for careful evaluation of database records prior to use in modelling, especially when the presence of cryptic species is suspected or many records are based on indirect evidence. To draw attention to this potential problem, we construct ENMs for the North American Sasquatch (i.e. Bigfoot). Specifically, we use a large database of georeferenced putative sightings and footprints for Sasquatch in western North America, demonstrating how convincing environmentally predicted distributions of a taxon’s potential range can be generated from questionable site-occurrence data. We compare the distribution of Bigfoot with an ENM for the black bear, Ursus americanus, and suggest that many sightings of this cryptozoid may be cases of mistaken identity. Journal of Biogeography

The fact that a model can be fit to any random assemblage of locality points is, of course, not surprising, but in cases where the distribution of these points appears to be organized, records may be less carefully scrutinized for errors. For instance, the Sasquatch sightings shown in Fig. 1 occur in areas where we might expect to observe such an organism based on preconceived notions, but we may be seriously biasing our inference of the distribution if many (or all) of the records represent misidentified black bear sightings. Although beyond the scope of this piece, it would be interesting for future theoretical studies to explore the effects of including misidentified specimens on ENMs, either using simulations or empirical data from closely related species.

The conclusion is that people are seeing Black Bears and Brown Bears. Interesting. I guess people will say the Sasquatch share the same environment and that explains why they have been proven to overlap.

Does Skunkape kill its prey like this?

This was from Enigmaticanomalies.com

Today Kevin spent a good part of the day assisting Tim Fasano with trail-cam recovery. It was a beautiful day for a hike in the swamp and surrounding woods.
Upon finding one of the trail-cams they were both excited to see that the camera had picked up 93 images!

Please log on to http://www.seminoleproject.com to see these photos when they are uploaded.

During the hike Kevin found a couple of different odd things. The first thing I found was the skull of some small animal. At this time I am not sure what it is but I am sure there is someone out there who can identify it. Please help me as I am not a trained biologist!

The second is the back half of a hog. It was cleanly severed in half with only a small tear near the ribs. There was no blood on the ground and there was no sight of the front half of the pig.

I don't think this was done by a person as who would purposely leave the ham and ribs? It appeared to be twisted in half after its' back was broken. I don't know if a bear would kill like this or not but I am hopping that there might be someone who can shed some insight

"Enigmatic Anomalies" TV show with Tim Fasano skunk ape episode promo

George, Kevin and Rob all work for a major cable TV network in the production end and they have formed a new company called "Enigmatic Anomalies.'  Their work is professional and slick (as you can see in this promo). They are producing a pilot for a new cable TV paranormal series. The main emphasis will be on Bigfoot.

This company is based on a lifetime of interest in the paranormal by these three guys. Unlike many shows on cable,  they use objectivity and reason in how they approach this topic. Everything is not a Bigfoot and there is 'no squatch in these woods.' That is what an amateur will do; this series does not insult your intelligence. They only want you to think about these matters in ways you may not have.

My new friends are masters at lighting, sound and stage. I know you will be very impressed by what they are doing. There is so much more to come. Please watch this short promo video and see for yourself.

The best part is my house is six blocks from the studio and these guys all live in the Tampa Bay area. Home grown talent.

The New York tree Bigfoot was also shot in Florida by Tim Fasano

Robert Pridjem at Lembo Lake Campground in New York State may have recorded a small Bigfoot in a tree. There were many people there for camping and fun. One of the groups sitting around a campfire recorded some strange behavior in a tree. It may show a baby Bigfoot swinging around. It seems to also show an adult, as well as, the juvenile.

The Animal Planet show Finding Bigfoot will profile this video in the season premiere on Sunday night. This video is not the only one ever taken of a Bigfoot in a tree. Tim Fasano recorded one in the summer of 2009. He posted it on Youtube and many experts examined it and confirmed that there was something in the tree.

What Matt Moneymaker will point out Sunday night is how long the arms are on the creature. I want you to notice how long the arms are on the creature that I shot in a tree in Florida three years ago. Chuck007 and Joe Black did a great job in analyzing this video

Florida Bigfoot Organization is formed

www.floridabigfoot.org

This new weblog is about the Florida Bigfoot Organization. This org will be devoted to real and scientific research of the Southern Skunk Ape along the Gulf Coast. My goal is to advance on a National level, with organized expeditions. The response for such a thing has been immense.

Anyone willing to offer their time is welcome in this organization. We will need people who have experience in science, hunting, animal identification, and hiking and camping skills. We will take this to the woods, and off of the messge boards. Are you ready?

The Southern Bigfoot is considered to be smaller then it's Pacific Northwest cousin. It has gone thru several evolutionary adaptations to cope with the swamp environment. It has longer hair to ward off bugs, and a smaller size so it produces less heat, to live in a hot environment. It is believed to migrate regionally in the south as the weather changes.

The late spring and summer will give us an opportunity to hook up with resources up north, to go on weekend expeditions with other groups. This is just a possibility, and we are certainly a long way off from this. The economy needs to get much better.

I have received many request from average people who have an interest in the outdoors and Bigfoot who want to help out. Many of these people are experienced in the woods, and have new ideas about how to approach research. There are no official members, only people that I have worked with in the field, and who may want to be included in future outings.

Modern research seems to have reached a dead end with the same old call blasting and wood knocking not yielding much evidence (it did not for me last week in the Green Swamp). A new paradigm might be developed by cooperation among people in which the money factor has been eliminated.

No money will change hands. I may even cater most of the events for I like to cook chicken and burgers over an open fire, and backwoods camping allows that to happen.

Just wanted to let you know what my ambition is for a new way to get this research on the road and off of the comment sections of blogs that accomplish nothing.

I have scheduled an expedition in Central Florida for Mid February. It will be over a three day period but you don't have to stay all three days. Primitive camping may not be for you and this is one good way to find out. Anything you could do to help, is more then welcome.

I hope this takes off and something becomes of it, like real evidence instead of folk tales.

Tim Stover (tcsjrbigfoot) will be on "Finding Bigfoot" in the Ohio episode

My friend Tim Stover will be on an upcoming episode of Finding Bigfoot that will take place at Saltfork State Park in Ohio. This park is in what they call the Sasquatch Triangle known for many Bigfoot sightings. They also call him the "Ohio Grassman." This version of the Bigfoot seems to be more aggressive then the North West version. He was contacted by a production staff member who told them they will be in Ohio for three weeks and want to recreate Tim's 1992 Bigfoot sighting. More details tomorrow.

Mckenzie River Bigfoot Is A Guy In A Wetsuit

Left arm, right arm, head exposed
and holding a towel in the right hand

Last July Animal Planet aired an episode of Finding Bigfoot shot in Oregon. The crew was on the Mckenzie River were a group of fly fisherman shot a video on a rafting expedition that seems to show a Bigfoot standing on the rocks overlooking a class 3 river rapids known as "the fish field." The video eventually showed up on YouTube (18 months later).

The Finding Bigfoot crew, led by Matt Moneymaker, wanted to get to the bottom of this sighting and they went out on a raft boat and video taped Bobo standing on the same rocks. Ranae Holland compared their video with the original claiming it could have been a human standing on the rocks. The image was no bigger then Bobo, who is 6' 5" tall and Sasquatch is believed to be mush larger. Matt Moneymaker believed that because the figure was all black, it had to be a big hairy beast.

I saw something on the TV that nobody mentioned on this team. It looked to me that the object was removing a shirt or towel. If so, then this was a human. I magnified this low-res image off the YouTube video, and enhanced the best I could. It does seem to show a man with a wet suit on with a towel in his right hand.

Finding Bigfoot Crew Searches For Bigfoot Today In Rhode Island

The "fab four"

After all the beer is drank, after all the witnesses tell their tales, after the Finding Bigfoot crew goes out at night and howls their lungs out in the dark woods of western Rhode Island, will they find anything? I, for one, would like to see something other then elk bugles represented as Bigfoot howls and tree knocking dubbed into the final cut.  Don't get me wrong, I believe in Bigfoot. I look for Bigfoot. However, I can't help but think they are under pressure to produce results. This is based on my experience in the field and  need to produce daily videos for YouTube.

Finding Bigfoot is under the time constraints of a television production schedule, and fudging things would be natural. That is fine for the general public. It is not fine for dedicated researchers. We expect more. Our demographic is one that Matt Moneymaker must be aware of.

The show seems to stick to a type of formula they use in all of their episodes. It is starting to get old. They need to come up with new ways to present evidence. In my YouTube videos I am constantly brainstorming for new ways to present my evidence. Perhaps this is something Keith Hoffman should consider.

I have an idea. They worked with Todd Standing. Why not Tom Biscardi and me? We have something going down in Florida in the next couple of months. They would be well severed in coming down here. Keith, You Ratings would be off the chart!

"-- Bigfoot could be on the loose somewhere in the woods of western Rhode Island. And an investigative team and camera crew are tracking him down.
"Finding Bigfoot," a TV series on Animal Planet, is in West Greenwich on Thursday, looking for the so-called Sasquatch, hoping to capture the creature on film, or at least capture the comments of people who've reported sightings. And there are many, said Keith Hoffman, executive producer of the show.
The program organized a meeting Wednesday night, inviting West Greenwich residents who have had Bigfoot sightings to attend. "There was quite a big turnout," Hoffman said.
The TV series, which debuted this year with six episodes, is filming its second season, 10 episodes for 2012, Hoffman said. Each episode features a different state.
Already the show has visited Georgia, Florida, North Carolina, Oregon, Washington and Alaska.
You wonder what's going on. If there's only one Bigfoot, why so many states?
"That is a misconception," Hoffman said. "There are many Bigfoots. The one in Rhode Island they call Big Rhody."

via newsblog.projo.com
I really hope this, and other episodes don't follow the cheesy formula of eye-witness accounts, and re-creations that don't prove anything. I wish they would stop adding audio and be honest about it. Did Cliff really hear the three tree knocks  or did they just pay him to say that? Is this show a hoax? Is is real? I think I know the answer.

Florida Bigfoot Researchers Conclude Bigfoot Is Not Real

"AFTER A 5 YEAR QUEST TO EXPLORE THE BIGFOOT PHENOMENON, FLORIDA BIGFOOT RESEARCHES HAVE DETERMINED ADEQUATE EVIDENCE IS LACKING TO JUSTIFY CONTINUED RESEARCH WITH THE HYPOTHESIS OF THE EXISTENCE OF A LARGE BIPEDAL HOMININ OR APE-LIKE CREATURE IN FLORIDA. Eye-witness testimony has been found to be unreliable and inadequate for independent verification. Further, human hoaxing by the use of fur suits has been documented as well as hoaxing of large humanlike prints identical to those presumed to be made by bigfoot/sasquatch/skunk ape as found in the literature."

"Widespread hoaxing,mis-identification of known fauna, mis-interpretation of purported bigfoot sign by mostly unskilled and/or amateur field investigators are causative factors for widespread belief in the existence of bigfoot. One example — recent multiple sightings of a large hairy, non-human bipedal creature in the panhandle area were investigated within a few days of the events with no physical evidence observed or collected. All of the reports were either on or adjacent to improved roads (making easy access by a potential hoaxer). Several reports of hair samples near sightings were reported second hand but samples never surfaced even after multiple attempts were made to the supposed possessors. Many examples may be posted on this site documenting the extent of hoaxing and mis-identification by unskilled field investigators. Further, no compelling evidence has yet been documented correlating supposed bigfoot behavior such as certain vocalizations, rock or stick throwing, or wood knocking. All are based entirely on speculative premise with no scientific documentation. In fact, all can be explained by more probable natural, known causes."

Read More here:

Bigfoot research is hard and frustrating work. Many people get out into the field and never come up with any evidence.  Five years may not be enough,. There is no time frame for finding Bigfoot. For a man like Adrian Erickson to just show up and claim that he has all this evidence smells like a hoax. What he is claiming is not possible. Why good people are now having doubts, how does this guy who will not give us his evidence not be called out by the people who know better. 

I don't share the conclusion of the Bigfoot Researchers who have stopped the Florida Project. I know  that I have found things that will keep me going. I have found real footprints and recorded howls in the field. I have had two trace sightings in areas where I was the only one present. I know that it is just a matter of time and moving forward that may yield successful results. However, after five years I may feel the same way they do. 

I ask the Bigfoot world to start using criticism. This man is a fake. Please, someone call him out on this. The same for Matt Moneymaker, find Bigfoot or admit he is not real. 

Sasquatch Or Something Else?

Is this what we are looking for?

This question was posed on the Above Top Secret website. Decades have passed since the Patterson/Gimlim film and there is still no hard evidence; so just what are we looking for? Is it really a giant 800 lb creature or something else?


FINDING BIGFOOT made it look really easy. A skunk ape behind a house in Florida, a skunk ape along a canal in the everglades (a horse), a thermal hit from a caravan of cars in a Georgia National Park, a Bigfoot going for a zagnut candy bar in North Carolina, a series of Bigfoot howls in the Oregon woods at night, a rabbit being stalked by a sasquatch in Washington, a Bigfoot breaching a laser parameter line in Alaska. Do you see where I am going with this? Is it really this easy Matt? Or is cashing the check the easy part? I find research to be very frustrating from a technical and scientific standpoint. The methodology can never be figured out.  I had a response that I posted on the thread:

"I am an Independent "skunk ape" field researcher from Florida, and find the work frustrating. It is getting difficult to use even some basic scientific methods in my work. For example, I am unable to repeat anything I have found or experience observation of any kind.
I have found footprints of different sizes. I have gone back for months into the same area and never found anymore prints. I can't tell you how frustrating this is to me. I have recorded howls at night that don't match anything I am familiar with. (It could be a sick animal, for example). Again, I cannot get another recording of said animal.
Forget about a sighting, I have some videos that show motion but only in wide angle with extreme loss of resolution when blown up. Sightings are reported in Florida all the time and I go to these areas with not much luck.
Frustration is no reason to give up on anything in life. But when I see the BFRO making money "hoaxing" on the Finding Bigfoot show when they seem to find something every time they go out....I cringe. That is not possible folks.
If Bigfoot exist, it is extremely rare and has an ability to elude man which is unknown to any other animal. Perhaps trail cams would, in the long run, yield more evidence. That is the direction many researchers have now taken, and where I am headed."...Tim Fasano

The BFRO seems to think that there is plenty of evidence...it is just how you measure and gauge such stuff.

 The assertion that there is absolutely no physical evidence is absolutely false. There is more physical evidence than most people realize. Physical evidence is found every month in various areas across the country. Distinct tracks that do not match other animal tracks, hairs that match each other but no known wild animals, and large scats that could not be made by any known species, are all "physical evidence."

"Road Kill Alley," The North End Of The Everglades, Finding Bigfoot, And Sharon Lee

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Finding Bigfoot: Using The Same FLIR Night Optics For Georgia and Oregon

I got this message on my YouTube site from a poster who compared the night FLIR images with each other and they are the same. It seems Matt Monymaker was "hoodwinked" more then Biscardi was...LOL

Hey Dude Look at what I just found.
I Just discovered conflicting thermo videos of finding bigfoot.
You can Check for yourself ,Open each youtube video
and put them side by side
First video is from Georgia and the second is from Oregon .
But they are the same video.Please leave your comment after looking at both videos.
/watch?v=pGqXisRMw6k&feature=f­vsr
At :30 Sec

/watch?v=_GXdqI-Vzos
At 3:27 Sec

Finding Bigfoot: Where Science Meets Entertainment For What End?

I did not watch the first episode of Finding Bigfoot. I thought all they would do is phony it up. I taped it last night because they were in Florida, and considering they drove within 8 miles of my house to there, at least I could be polite enough to watch.

Let me blunt. I like James "Bobo" Fay, he is beyond cool and reminds me of Tony Saragusa of the NFL. He has that smart ass wit, and real charisma. Ranae Holland is a scientist and hot in a school teacher sort of way. Matt Moneymaker makes my 'gaydar' go off and Bobo must know it for his comment "anything you want bigboy." Cliff Barackman seems to have been marginalized because he is two real and objective, and does not meet the needs of the producers...WHO ARE INTERESTED IN RESULTS!!!!!!

There were two objects fakes, or best, misrepresentation of thermal evidence with the night optics. Matt Moneymaker walking out to a skinny production assistant they saw on the thermal was wrong for them to do. It undermines all the good work people are doing. They did they same things at the Bridges home during their night operation. Bigfoot research just does not go like that. Oh, the Bridges are just like all Americans they know how to cast prints and know about dermal ridges...just makes me wonder.

Matt Moneymaker walking out to the Florida Skunk Ape?

Why did they not show the "sasquatch" run away. They just had Bobo say it was running off but they did not show it. This was disappointing to me (my tape turned off because I had only set it for 60 minutes..is it a 90m show?). I think this was phony and anyone could have staged it with a good thermal. Sorry, I don't buy it.

Tim Fasano and Tom Biscardi worked together in the Florida swamps just days before this episode aired on Animal Planet. If we are supposed to be hoaxers, and we had the same equipment, why did we not pull this? We did not find shit. Or perhaps, we knew who would believe this crap? I don't.

Bigfoot/Skunk Ape Footprint Found In Central Florida

A recent report to the BFRO from a hunter in Florida told of finding a large footprint (again, hunters and good ole' boys are the ones finding these things). He was in the Flying Eagle WMA in Citrus county above Tampa. He was in a very thick jungle, swamp area with many cypress knees sticking out of the ground which makes moving around very slow. When he found the footprint, he did take two good cell phone images of it. The print is very similar to the ones I have been finding for the last two years in Central Florida.

Looks like a right foot

BFRO investigator Cathy Betz did a follow up interview and found the account to be credible. The print may have been fresh from the amount of excited wildlife activity that to this reporter seemed strange. This man had spent most of his life in the Florida woods, and had never encountered anything like this.

The swamp area he and his friend were in

Bart Cutino And His Incredible Italian Pasta Sauce

I thought I could make a great pasta sauce. I came from an Italian family and paid attention to how a good sauce is made. I use wine and fresh vegies and spices. My recipe has done me good for many years. I now have to take a back seat to Bigfoot Investigator Bart Cutino with this off the chart sauce. I am starving and this seems beyond good. I am saving this recipe for next Sunday...Yum!

"That's what I'm talking about...7 hr sauce (everything slow-cooked to max flavor) with meat, ground beef, garlic, hawaiian onions, san marzano whole-peeled tomatoes, amore & hunts paste, carrot juice, pureed sundried tom, fresh basil, organic brown sugar, sea salt, fresh cracked pepper, dash of cayenne & Spanish olive oil."...Bart Cutino Posted On Facebook 

Withlacoochee Richloam Track

I went on an all day expedition Sunday to the Withlacoochee Richloam track in the State Forest in Central Florida. It was a day of discovery and orientation as I move in on BFRO class A sighting areas.

Raising My Game With The New Tech

28 8 30.4 N 82 14 59.2 W - Enter these coordinates into Google Earth and you will see where the "Indonesia Swamp" video was recorded. In the future, all of my videos and photos and blog post will have GPS coordinates to allow anyone to go behind me and see for themselves what I found. When I cast a print, I will give the Latitude and longitude of the location. This will be done in the spirit of scientific inquiry. Scientist always submit their work for others to scrutinize. That what I am wanting to do.

This software is from BFRO and it can be loaded onto your Google Earth. It shows ALL Bigfoot sightings that are in their database and it will update automatically when a new one is reported. I will never have a bad thing to say about the BFRO again!